rs1061646
A SNP in the FANCA gene on chromosome 16. Its most notable genotype is G;G: 1.16x increased risk for breast cancer
- Gene
- FANCA
- Location
- Chr 1689,739,569 (GRCh38)
- Highest magnitude
- 0.0Typical
- Tested on
- 23andMe, AncestryDNA, FamilyTreeDNA
- Minor allele frequency
- 48%
Genotypes
Plus strand, as in 23andMe and AncestryDNA files.
- G;GMost notableBad1.16x increased risk for breast cancer
- A;GNot rated1.08x increased risk for breast cancer
- A;ANot ratednormal risk
SNPedia records rs1061646 on the minus strand: (C;C), (C;T), (T;T). Magnitude rates how notable a genotype is from 0 to 10, not how risky it is.
Frequency
Share of each genotype in 11 HapMap populations.
- AverageG;G 22% A;G 43% A;A 35%
- European ancestry (Utah)G;G 41% A;G 44% A;A 15%
- Han Chinese (Beijing)G;G 2% A;G 42% A;A 56%
- Japanese (Tokyo)G;G <1% A;G 29% A;A 70%
- Yoruba (Nigeria)G;G 14% A;G 46% A;A 41%
- African ancestry (Southwest US)G;G 33% A;G 35% A;A 32%
- Chinese (Denver)G;G 6% A;G 42% A;A 51%
- Gujarati IndianG;G 18% A;G 53% A;A 30%
- Luhya (Kenya)G;G 16% A;G 48% A;A 36%
- Mexican ancestry (Los Angeles)G;G 24% A;G 45% A;A 31%
- Maasai (Kenya)G;G 22% A;G 53% A;A 25%
- TuscanG;G 64% A;G 32% A;A 4%
Related
Conditions, medicines and genes
Notes
From SNPedia
Notes
breast cancer rs1061646 was associated with risk in the initial study (p=0.0052), and in the replication studies (p=0.032). In a combined analysis, (8,556 cases, 9,605 controls) this SNP yielded an 8% increase in risk per allele. Note that this analysis was carried out in a multi-ethnic study, and rs1061646 showed more consistent association with risk in non-Caucasian populations.
Source and license
Adapted from rs1061646 on SNPedia, using a snapshot taken October 16, 2026. SNPedia content is shared under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 US, and this page is shared under the same license.
SNPedia is a community-edited wiki. Its entries can be incomplete, out of date or wrong, and nothing here is a diagnosis or medical advice. Magnitude is a community rating of how interesting a genotype is, not a risk score.