rs4950
A SNP in the CHRNB3 gene on chromosome 8. Its most notable genotype is A;A: Most common genotype in several populations; yet also higher leadership occupancy?
- Gene
- CHRNB3
- Location
- Chr 842,697,490 (GRCh38)
- Highest magnitude
- 1.0Minor
- Tested on
- 23andMe, AncestryDNA, FamilyTreeDNA
- Minor allele frequency
- 36%
Genotypes
Plus strand, as in 23andMe and AncestryDNA files.
SNPedia records rs4950 on the minus strand: (T;T). Magnitude rates how notable a genotype is from 0 to 10, not how risky it is.
Frequency
Share of each genotype in 11 HapMap populations.
- AverageA;A 43%
- European ancestry (Utah)A;A 60%
- Han Chinese (Beijing)A;A 53%
- Japanese (Tokyo)A;A 75%
- Yoruba (Nigeria)A;A 5%
- African ancestry (Southwest US)A;A 9%
- Chinese (Denver)A;A 64%
- Gujarati IndianA;A 56%
- Luhya (Kenya)A;A 5%
- Mexican ancestry (Los Angeles)A;A 71%
- Maasai (Kenya)A;A 10%
- TuscanA;A 66%
Related
Notes
From SNPedia
Show notes, about 120 words
One paper published in 2013 (and not replicated since then to our knowledge), titled "Born to Lead? A Twin Design and Genetic Association Study of Leadership Role Occupancy", performed a GWAS study that concluded that leadership role occupancy is associated with rs4950, a SNP in the neuronal acetylcholine receptor gene (CHRNB3). Individuals with the rs4950(T;T) genotype (as oriented in dbSNP and SNPedia) are statistically more likely (odds ratio ~1.5) to occupy leadership positions as compared to rs4950(C;T) or (C;C) individuals. Popular news about this finding includes: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130115111553.htm and https://www.23andme.com/you/community/thread/16689/
A;A
see text on main rs-page
Source and license
Adapted from rs4950 on SNPedia, using a snapshot taken October 16, 2026. SNPedia content is shared under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 US, and this page is shared under the same license.
SNPedia is a community-edited wiki. Its entries can be incomplete, out of date or wrong, and nothing here is a diagnosis or medical advice. Magnitude is a community rating of how interesting a genotype is, not a risk score.